8.7 KiB
Architecture — Dược Thư RAG Medical Chatbot
Overview
A medical chatbot grounded in the Vietnamese National Drug Formulary (Dược thư quốc gia Việt Nam 2018), built as a microservices monorepo. Users ask drug-related questions through a web chat UI; answers are generated via retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over the formulary content, always citing the source drug monograph/section, and always carrying a medical disclaimer.
Service responsibilities & communication
| Service | Owns | Talks to |
|---|---|---|
| api-gateway (NestJS) | Single public entry point; request routing, JWT validation, rate limiting | Routes to auth-service, user-service, chat-service, ai-service over internal REST |
| auth-service (NestJS) | Signup/login, password hashing, JWT issuance/refresh | Postgres (users); no dependency on other services |
| user-service (NestJS) | Profile data, preferences, account settings | Postgres (profiles), called by gateway |
| chat-service (NestJS) | Chat session lifecycle, message history persistence | Postgres (chat_sessions, chat_messages); calls ai-service per user message, persists both turns |
| ai-service (Python/FastAPI) | RAG orchestration: embed query → vector search in Qdrant → build grounded prompt → call OpenAI → return answer + citations | Qdrant (vector search), OpenAI API; stateless, does not own chat history |
| ingestion (Python, offline batch) | One-time/periodic job: parse PDF → monographs → chunks → embeddings → upsert to Qdrant | Qdrant (write), OpenAI embeddings API; runs as CLI/CI/k8s Job, never in the live request path |
| web (Next.js) | Chat UI, auth UI, citation/disclaimer rendering, session list | Calls api-gateway only |
Sync vs async: the live chat path (web → gateway → chat-service → ai-service → Qdrant + OpenAI → back) is synchronous request/response. Ingestion is fully decoupled, offline, batch — it populates Qdrant ahead of time and is never triggered by a chat request, since parsing the 37MB PDF and embedding thousands of chunks takes minutes. Internal protocol is REST/JSON for v1; a future gRPC migration is a documented option (see ADRs), not needed now.
Data stores
- Vector DB: Qdrant. Chosen over pgvector because retrieval quality here
depends on metadata-filtered ANN search (filter by drug name / section type
combined with vector similarity) over a highly structured corpus — Qdrant
makes that a first-class, single query. It also scales independently from
the transactional Postgres and has a mature Helm chart for the production
k8s target. See
docs/adr/0001-vector-db-qdrant.md. - Relational DB: PostgreSQL. One instance, logically separated per service (users/credentials, profiles, chat sessions+messages).
- Redis. Session/refresh-token cache, rate-limit counters, and reserved as the future job-queue backend (BullMQ/Celery) if async admin-triggered re-ingestion or background jobs are added later.
RAG ingestion pipeline (PDF-specific)
The formulary is a structured per-drug reference, not free prose — the
pipeline exploits that structure instead of naive fixed-size chunking. This
section reflects an actual empirical investigation of the real PDF (not
assumptions) — see docs/adr/0003-pdf-parsing-strategy.md for the full
methodology, cross-tool comparison, and validation numbers.
- Extraction: PyMuPDF (
fitz) as primary extractor. This document has no bookmark/outline (doc.get_toc()returns 0 entries — confirmed, do not rely on it) and is a tagged PDF with only a shallow, unusable structure tree (~29 generic H1/P elements covering a fraction of 1668 pages — also confirmed dead-end, not a data source). PyMuPDF's reading order was cross-validated againstpdfplumberandopendataloader-pdfon real sample pages: pdfplumber's default text order is unreliable for this layout (scrambles paragraph order, leaks marked-content artifacts) — use it only for its dedicated table-extraction API, never for body text. Raw per-page extraction is persisted toingestion/data/interim/so re-segmentation doesn't require re-running the expensive extraction step. - Segmentation: drug-entry boundaries are detected via bold-font
spans (PyMuPDF span
fontcontaining"Bold"), not font-size alone — font size for title/heading spans varies between monographs (confirmed: 10.0pt and 9.5pt both occur for genuine drug-title headings), so bold is the reliable signal, all-caps + short length narrows it to monograph titles specifically. Section headings inside a monograph are also bold spans, cross-checked against a canonical taxonomy (chi_dinh,chong_chi_dinh,lieu_dung,tac_dung_phu,tuong_tac_thuoc, plus real observed extras liketen_thuong_mai"Tên thương mại" not in the book's own documented 19-field list — treat the taxonomy as open/ extensible, not a fixed enum). Multi-line wrapped titles/headings (long Vietnamese names/vaccine names) must be merged across consecutive bold+all-caps lines before matching — this was the single largest source of missed detections in validation. Output:{drug_id, drug_name, source_page_range, sections: {...}}per drug, persisted toingestion/data/processed/monographs.jsonland validated both automatically (see ADR 0003) and via manual spot-check iningestion/notebooks/. - Chunking: each
(drug, section)pair is the natural chunk unit; never split a section unless it exceeds a token budget (~500-800 tokens), in which case sub-chunk with a sliding window (400 tokens, 50 overlap), tagging the same drug+section metadata pluspart_index. Every chunk carriesdrug_name,section_type,source_page_range,chunk_idas Qdrant payload — this is what makes citations possible. - Embedding + load: OpenAI
text-embedding-3-smallin batches, upserted into a versioned Qdrant collection (drug_monographs_v1) keyed bychunk_idfor idempotent re-runs; collection aliasing allows re-ingesting with a changed chunking strategy without downtime. - Batch job, not synchronous: runs as a CLI command locally, and as a
Kubernetes
Job/CronJobin production — never inside the ai-service request path.
Safety / guardrails
- System prompt instructs the model to answer only from retrieved context, never state a dosage/contraindication/interaction not present in it, always append a disclaimer, and say "not found in the formulary" rather than guess when retrieval is irrelevant.
- Retrieval-confidence gate: below a similarity threshold, skip the LLM call entirely and return a canned "consult a professional" response.
- Citations from metadata, not LLM prose: the
citationslist is built directly from retrieved-chunk metadata, independent of what the LLM says, so the frontend can always show verifiable sources. - Disclaimer enforced at multiple layers: system prompt + a non-LLM-generated static string always appended to the API response + a persistent, non-dismissible UI banner.
- Scoped refusal: out-of-scope questions (e.g. general symptom diagnosis) get a scoped refusal directing to a professional, not an ungrounded general-knowledge answer.
Build roadmap
- Ingestion pipeline + populated, queryable vector DB. Done when a CLI run populates Qdrant and a test script retrieves the correct drug/section chunk for a sample query — no API, no LLM call yet.
- ai-service (FastAPI) wrapping RAG + OpenAI. Done when a
curlto/queryreturns a grounded answer with a traceable citation and an always-present disclaimer. - auth/user/chat services + api-gateway. Done when register → login → chat message flows end-to-end through the gateway only, persisted in Postgres.
- Next.js frontend chat UI. Done when a browser user can log in, ask a question, and see a grounded answer with citation + disclaimer banner.
- Containerize + docker-compose local. Done when
docker compose upfrom a clean checkout brings up the full stack and the Phase 4 flow works. - Kubernetes/Helm + Terraform + CI + ArgoCD (GitOps) deployment. Done
when CI builds/tests/pushes an image and bumps the target environment's
Helm values file, the team's ArgoCD instance (see
infra/argocd/,docs/adr/0002-argocd-gitops.md) picks up the change and syncs the cluster, and the Phase 4 flow works against the k8s-hosted stack. CI never runskubectl/helmdirectly against a cluster. Cloud provider choice (AWS/GCP/Azure) only affects the Terraform module implementations, not this repo's structure.
See docs/adr/ for architecture decision records and docs/runbooks/ for
operational runbooks (added as they're needed).